Monthly Archive for September, 2003

Alien: Director’s Cut as cinema release

I just found out that there’s an Alien: Director’s Cut being released on October 21st this year! Until right now I didn’t know that?! This’ll be… interesting. I’m going to go Google it a bit and see what I find.

1 minute later: Here’s the official trailer site. (and here’s the official site, though there’s nothing there) I haven’t seen it yet.

While I wait for the download: I’m thinking that perhaps Scott went back and inserted some of the deleted footage (which can be found on the current DVD), but why? Alien certainly didn’t need it, and most of the deleted scenes were better left out as it is. So unless they dug up some previously unseen footage then I doubt this was entirely necessary. I haven’t heard of any such footage, and I have looked into this thoroughly in the past. Now Alien3 on the other hand has tons and tons of unreleased deleted scenes that would do the movie a great favor if inserted into a special edition. But I fear that it will continue to be child that was left behind :(.

The reason for it being re-released deleted footage or not, is probably to raise interest for the new 9-disc Alien Quadrilogy DVD set coming out at some point. Information is still scarce, but it’s definitely coming.

Having seen the trailer: Well the trailer only shows one of the scenes originally deleted from the theatrical release back in ’78. Namely the scene where Ripley finds Dallas cocooned in the bowels of the ship. It’s a cool scene, but I must admit being somewhat apprehensive about them re-inserting it, mostly because it half-way breaks some of the continuity in the Alien movies; a continuity which is broken enough as it is. This scene was obviously conceived before any of the other movies were even thought of, but the idea is that the Alien cocoons people and slowly turns them into eggs. Which of course, according to the gospel of Aliens, isn’t how that whole thing works, what with the Queen and all?

It is however cool news in the sense that it is re-released to cinemas and it lends itself superbly to the silver screen. Being probably the most aesthetically pleasing – and to me – most hauntingly scary movie of all time. I was of course born a tad bit too late to have seen it when it was first released. But I managed to catch an Alien marathon in Copenhagen back in ’97, and it was spectacular (and expensive!). But the copy of Alien we saw looked like it could have been the original released reels; more scratches than you can shake a facehugger at.

I just wish they would give Alien3 the Special Edition treatment instead, but I doubt that they ever will due to its poor reception at the box office. But hey, who am I kidding. Of course they will revisit it again — When the third DVD box set is released :)

Update: Dark Horizons says that: “A trailer is tipped to be sent out ‘loose in the film can’ with the ‘Alien Director’s Cut’ release on Halloween.” — That indeed would be interesting to see. That can crash so bad that it would make T3 look like a critically acclaimed masterpiece.

Update: This site says that the cocoon scene in fact is the only new scene… Some Director’s Cut eh? I would’ve expected a bit more from Ridley Scott. But if his excuse is that he’s busy working on the fabled Blade Runner DVD Box Set, then I could care less.

Update: Here you can find a complete list of deleted and never filmed scenes. Also, rumor has it that if this release goes well Aliens will also get the cleanup, buffed up soundtrack and re-release tour.

Thoughts on video and audio conferencing

In reply to an entry by Brian

“A long time ago it dawned on me that a computer needs a ringer like a telephone – completely seperate from the speakers, so you can use it for stuff like netmeeting and skype, knowing that it will actually make a phone-like noise on the other end of the line.”

“I guess the computer speaker could be used? I don’t know if it’s loud enough.”

I used video conferencing every day for 2 years for talking with Rikke (from Scotland to Denmark), and it soon occurred to me that the computer will never be, at least not in the current form, used for phoning by the average person. Or even by most geeks for that matter!

The ‘videophone’ has essentially been here for a long time, but nobody wants to sit down in front of a computer to use it. (Essentially it can be argued that you don’t want to sit down in front of a computer to browse the web, you just don’t know it yet…)

The alternatives are of course getting easier and better, AOL Instant Messenger">AIM and now also MSN Messenger have fairly good and easy to use video and audio features. But they still require substantial ‘training’ in comparison with a phone.

So really applying a ‘ringer’ to your computer to give in the same functionality as a phone is a bit backwards thinking. Rather the computer should be brought to fullfill the same function as a phone on the same terms as the phone. Partially doable with a laptop, but even that is still just a substitute.

For it to ever work properly you need a computer-phone which utilizes the Internet as if it was the phonegrid. It shouldn’t require any maintenance, but merely work at any given time. Pick up the phone and ‘dial Michael’ and shazaam. No more “Are you online? Is you webcam plugged in? I can’t hear you, can you hear me?! Sound is choppy, let’s try lowering the sound quality, say 4Hz?”. In my opinion it just isn’t a medium worth pursuing as anything other than a testbed for a proper hardware solution.

One can only hope that the ‘conferencing’ front has gained momentum with AIM, MSN Messenger and iChat on the move. Personally I’m still flabbergasted that this hasn’t been properly implemented in full yet. It’s at least 5 years late! And we’re still waiting for the first real step, a communications standard. Right now we’re merely heading into yet another, merely small-scale, browser-war.

Update: Slightly related and somewhat interesting story about the broadcasting of video using iChat.

FeedDemon

I linked to it on the sidebar a while ago (I might even have mentioned it in the blog main), but it’s time for me to make sure the message gets across properly. What is the message?

FeedDemon.

Thaaat’s right. Feed-Demon. And what does it do? It eats RSS feeds (what’re those?) for breakfast, that’s what! If you read more than a few blogs a day I can’t emphasize the ease that FeedDemon will bring into your life :) — I currently check some 80-or-so blogs and about 20 – 30 ‘links’-feeds plus some 40 tech, news and nerd sites. And all in all it takes me about half an hour max. to walk through all of it.

Give it a try, you can even borrow my RSS blog feed and my RSS comments feed (and of course my referrer feed).

You’ll love it I’m sure!

FYI: It’s still in beta, but except for a group-deletion bug I haven’t had any problems.

Now if only every site had RSS feeds my life would be a lot easier (hint hint, nudge nudge :))

Matrix Revolutions: 6 TV-Spots

They’re low-quality, and presumably leaked (though I’m not sure about that), but well worth watching for the – like me – matrix-super-fans out there. Here you go (Torrent).

Review of XBMP and the Xbox as a media center

Colin McRae & DOA3

As requested, here are a few notes on how the Xbox is currently faring as a ‘media center’.

Continue reading ‘Review of XBMP and the Xbox as a media center’

Spending spree

Went ahead and bought an extra Controller S – bringing me up to 3 – for my Xbox today as well as an adapter for non-scart ‘enabled’ TV’s. Both were on 40% sale. Also I bought an old 1985 – or 83, depends on where you get your info – VHS tape called From Star Wars to Jedi: The Making of a Saga, which is part of a 3-piece set of tapes that cover the original Star Wars trilogy. It was a mere 60dkr (~ £5 or $8) but I have seen it being sold online at 5 – 6 times that price.

And then of course there was the 120GB HDD and the accompanying screwdriver set needed to pry open the Xbox.

Ahh, now I can rest easy.