Beware: This entry contains spoilers of the movie, and the comments section contains spoilers for the books. Consider yourself warned.
Forgive me, if I have a hard time putting sentences together in a coherent manner, but my brain is being actively jammed by horrid cover-bands and carbon-copy ‘trendy’ DJ’s with their ‘eclectic’ (read: carbon-copy) reggae collections currently devouring most of the peace and sanctity in inner Copenhagen, on this grey and otherwise Bioshock-worthy Caturday.
Now it might be because I honestly thought The Bourne Identity would suck big time when I first saw it, that I have grown to love it as much as I do. Because against all odds, it didn’t suck; rather it was a genuinely fresh action romp, and Matt Damon, as unlikely an action hero as he is, was perfect in the role as the lost-child-come-terminator, Jason Bourne.
The Bourne Supremacy, cool title aside, though, was considerably lesser movie for me. It delivered just short of what was needed in character moments and story progression, to keep the relentless and at times over-stylized and dizzyingly hand-held action sequences rolling along. And while I thought it was a gutsy move to kill off Bourne’s girlfriend in the first ten minutes of the film, it did cause the problem of turning Bourne into the Terminator for the duration of the film.
And where the first film had Bourne confused about his origin and abilities, relying on, and eventually falling in love with Marie. In the Supremacy, Bourne is responsible for no one but himself, and that really hurt both the character and the overall film.
Now, the Bourne Ultimatum is largely more of the same (not surprisingly, as it is the same director). But, it does manage to pull a few neat tricks out of its sleeve (the hair cutting scene was a nice touch), even if the story and character moments serve as little more than thin layers of mortar between the brick-like 20 – 30 minute long action sequences that’re what it’s all about.
And the action sequences are great. Immensely enjoyable, hard-hitting and with nary a one-liner spewing bald old man in sight; yay!
Somewhere between the first and this, the third movie however, Bourne turned from a reluctant action star into a machine-like icon. Some of it is attributable to the story, sure, but between the ‘is that Matt Damon on that poster, I can’t tell’ marketing campaign and Paul Greengrass’ fixation on style, it feels as if the last remnants of Bourne’s humanity are being sacrificed in favor of style.
Damon did a great job though, I still find him the most interesting action hero out there. But by now Bourne doesn’t really have a weak spot, making it hard to root for him.
And sure enough, there are quite a few differences between the first film and its sequels. One of the more interesting (which I might be imagining), is how the first film doesn’t make use of establishing shots when moving between locations, letting each location flow into the next, much like how Bourne and Marie witness it, from the seats of her Mini.
The sequels however, do. It’s interesting because I actually felt slightly confused by some of the establishing shots. At one time I wasn’t sure if we were in London or New York. It was great to see them not simply pulling archival footage of the Manhattan skyline, but still… You don’t need to establish the CSI HQ every time you cut there, me thinks.
Another interesting difference is the CIA’s seeming tendency towards hiring only trendy fashion-conscious model-worthy males as ‘assets’. When they’re not trying to kill Bourne, they spend most of their time in the gym working on their biceps or in second-hand markets looking for that one-of-a-kind shoulder bag or leather jacket. I think they’re all gay.
It’s all slightly too much style for me.
I do watch espionage thrillers to enter a world that would otherwise not be available to me, but Greengrass’ stylization is removing it from reality to such an extend that I feel it is hurting the edge it has over borderline sci-fi like James Bond.
Also, it’s becoming increasingly easier to spot the bad guys in the Bourne movies; they’re all top-level CIA men past their prime.
But, dammit; the fights are fucking cool, and the pacing ferocious and so I don’t feel too bad about any of it.
A few final things, that did however bother me a bit. First of all, the books must be garbage. Amnesia? Secret evil government training program? A tub where our protagonist was submitted to vicious experiments? I don’t know how much of this is in the books The books are apparently quite different from the movies, but this stuff is throw-away airplane novel material at best (or computer game material… Ehm; damn).
Either way, it is horrible! Just downright bad… But it does make for great, if slightly dimwitted action flicks.
But; Amnesia? Secret, evil government training program? A tub where our protagonist was submitted to vicious experiments?… It’s not even reminicient of… It is X-Men 2! Seriously! It’s the backstory of Wolverine, to the letter! Hell, Brian Cox was even in X-Men… Come on!
Finally, why in the hell did they change the end credits song? The first two movie both used Extreme Ways by Moby, but in Ultimatum, it’s some horrible bastard cover.
I love that track, and I was so pumped when Bourne was in the water, exactly how we first saw him in Identity and the strings of Extreme Ways open up, he starts swimming away. It’s such a perfect way to end this movie; and they fucked it up by using a cover! Fucked. It. Up.
It was a bit like having to sit through the raping of In the Air Tonight during the new Miami Vice (which is a case of style over substance to such a degree I would rather watch British soaps!).
Don’t. Do. It.
That, and they changed the credits sequence graphics once again. And they do use ‘oh noes, a firewall!’ as an excuse to do ‘stuff’, which makes me feel queasy.
Minor things, of course, but nonetheless.
Conversely, it was cool how the end of Supremacy didn’t occur until well into Ultimatum (making me scratch my head for the first half of the movie). Or how they still used a really old photo of Damon to send to assets and police.
Overall however, the fights will kick your ass, the car chase was damn badass, and it is very much worth both your time and money.

I haven’t seen the third film so I can’t speak for that yet, but I’ve loved the first two (the first more so). Now, as for the books. They are nothing like the films. At all. To make the differences clear, by the end of the third book in the original Ludlum trilogy (I don’t consider the follow on books by other authors worthy of the same name), Bourne is well into his fifties, still married to Marie, has two children and has just defeated Carlos the Jackal at the Russian Novogrod training facility in a viscous end battle.
About the only thing in common between the films and the books is Bourne’s name and the amnesia. They even rewrote his entire past, gone from being a mercenary who lost his (first) wife in the Vietnam war to some CIA run-of-the-mill assassin.
Trust me, the books are ten times better than the film. The plot is more complex than any other espionage novel or film I’ve ever read and the characters are infinitely more deep and detailed. Heck, even the action in the books is good compared to the film!
I agree with Luke. The books are totally different. I’ve listened to the audiobooks, and they’re quite gripping. The Supremacy and Ultimatum are totally different from the books of the same titles. Identity shares a few similarities.
It seems it is a new version of Extreme Ways by Moby himself rather than a bastard cover:
[…] new version of ‘extreme ways’ does sound pretty good at the end, if i do narcissistically say so myself […]
Good detectve work, though aye caramba, the man has lost it.
I have to say I quite enjoyed the movie, although not nearly as good as the first it was still enjoyable.
As for the tub for preforming vicious experiments. It is quite similar to a torture technique referred to as waterboarding, which is where you restrain the person and pour water over their face to simulate drowning. Although not exactly as the movie portrays it, it may not be as far-fetched as you might think.
It was only in 2006 that the United States banned it’s use by military personnel
Ahh, true Ludlum fans! I agree with Luke…ditto
I was so disturbed by the killing off of Marie. She is Jason’s/David’s glue. And, where is Mo and Peter? I was not happy with Conklin being killed off in the first movie and then Ward in the second either. But after seeing the first two, I made up my mind that nothing in the Bourne movies was going to be the same as the books. So now I’m just enjoying the ride. I think the third movie has captured more of the spirit of Ludlum, and I cant wait for the next one to come out. Some how along the way though, Jason has to have children before they make the final movie Bourne Prodogy.
I like the new version of ‘extreeme ways’. Very appropriate.
Bourne 2 > Bourne 3 > Bourne 1
Suck it down Heilebuns! :)
I donno, the second movie’s action scenes just left me wanting more. The third movie delivered on that, but there wasn’t enough of them dammit! With these movies I’ve grown towards wanting the action more than the plot, sorry :)
BOING!
Not enough?! It’s 2 hours of action scenes! Where the second movie had no character moments at all, at least Ultimatum had just enough to make the action scenes carry some weight.
Mazynator, there will be some sucking down going on, but not in the way you might have expected it…
Luke L, dude, don’t post spoilers to the books man. That’s just wrong!